The hemorrhoid itself
What you notice
In the office
Surgical options
What it costs
Getting started
Read first
Where we see people
Get in touch
Reading
THD
Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialisation, which is the second of the two named alternatives to a conventional operation for internal hemorrhoids. The long name is doing useful work, so it is worth unpacking rather than skipping.
The name
Take the term apart and it tells you most of the idea behind it. Transanal describes the route in. Hemorrhoidal says what is being treated. Dearterialisation says the arterial supply is what gets addressed, rather than the tissue being cut away or fixed back into position with staples.
Which makes it conceptually closer to banding than to removal, in the sense that both of them work on the supply rather than by excision, while this one is still a surgical procedure rather than an office procedure. It is named for internal hemorrhoids specifically, not for external disease.
Beyond what the published term itself supports, this page stops. Stapling is the other named alternative, and conventional removal is what both of them are alternatives to, including for the large external disease where neither of them applies at all.
How it comes up
Like stapling, it only arises once internal disease has moved past what an office procedure can hold.
Conventional removal, stapling and dearterialisation. Hearing only one of the three is a reason to ask why.
If this is recommended, you should hear why the arterial approach suits what was found in your examination.
Operative specifics and recovery belong in that conversation, with your written questions in hand.
Judging a recommendation
There is a practical problem with a procedure like this one. The material a patient can actually reach about it is thin, and most of what a provider publishes is marketing. So the usual advice to go away and read up before deciding does not get you very far here.
What does work is moving the question off the procedure and onto the recommendation. Why this one, for what my examination specifically found. What happens if it does not hold. What the alternatives were, and the reason each was set aside. Three answers, and they tell you more than any brochure.
A clinician who answers all three in terms of your own findings is giving you something you can actually judge. One who answers in generalities is not. Choosing a clinic covers that test, what the evidence says covers the sourcing, and the office comparison covers whether you need surgery at all.
The alternatives
The two routes this is an alternative to, and the reading that prepares you for a surgical appointment.
Conventional removal, and the only route for large external disease.
Learn moreThe other named alternative, which repositions rather than removes.
Learn moreWhere the published sources agree about these options, and where not.
Learn moreWhich published claims should make you more careful, not less.
Learn moreCommon questions
What people ask about the option with the longest name and the least written about it.
The THD procedure was explained with a drawing: tying off the supply rather than cutting. The recovery was easier than I had feared.
They told me honestly that THD is not for every grade and why mine suited it. The decision was reasoned.
Arranged with a surgeon who does it regularly and followed up at the clinic. Nothing fell between the two.
Back at work within the week, as the doctor had said was likely. Recovery as described.
From the blog
Get started
None of the surgical routes matters until the examination shows an office procedure will not hold for your grade. That is the question to settle first.
If an office procedure suits your grade, that is what you will be offered instead.